Why I Stopped Using XML for Configuration
Why I Stopped Using XML for Configuration

Why I Stopped Using XML for Configuration

Author
Shiv Bade
Tags
configuration
YAML
XML
code readability
Published
July 30, 2013
Featured
Slug
Tweet
Once upon a time, I had entire deployment scripts, server configs, and Spring beans defined in XML. It worked—until it didn’t. Debugging deeply nested structures and understanding overrides across environments became painful.
Around this time, I started migrating to YAML and annotation-based configuration, and the experience felt refreshing. The code became self-documenting, and the delta between dev and prod setups became easier to reason about.
This post isn’t an anti-XML rant. It’s a recognition that readability and maintainability should be first-class goals, not afterthoughts.
What I learned: - Prefer formats that support diffs well (and are human-friendly). - Layered configs are fine, but keep them discoverable. - Declarative is good—until you need control flow. Know where to draw the line.